Thursday, December 22, 2011

Sustainable Development


Sustainable Development

Here is the “Wikipedia” definition:  Sustainable development (SD) is a pattern of resource use, that aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but also for generations to come (sometimes taught as ELF-Environment, Local people, Future). The term was used by the Brundtland Commission which coined what has become the most often-quoted definition of sustainable development as development that "meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."[1][2]

Sustainable development ties together concern for the carrying capacity of natural systems with the social challenges facing humanity. As early as the 1970s "sustainability" was employed to describe an economy "in equilibrium with basic ecological support systems."[3] Ecologists have pointed to The Limits to Growth[4], and presented the alternative of a "steady state economy"[5] in order to address environmental concerns.

The field of sustainable development can be conceptually broken into three constituent parts: environmental sustainability, economic sustainability and sociopolitical sustainability.

This sounds harmless enough until we look into how this phrase was coined.  The UN started in the mid – seventies with a group of academics looking at the problem of sustainability of the earth….a noble idea.  This was studied and reports were given at conferences and life plugged along.  Then there comes a conference in Rio in the late 90’s to implement “sustainable development” and out of the conference came a UN Document called “Agenda 21” .  This document was signed by George H W Bush on behalf of the US.  Clinton then created a commission on “sustainable development”, and it exists today.   Over the years the commission has passed all of the principles of  “ sustainable development” down to all levels of government as though this is the goal that we should shoot for….clear down to the local county planning commission.

The three guiding principles of Agenda 21 are:

·       The majority of land should be owned by the government (there is a map of all of the land that the government wants to grab in the USA.)

·       The population of the world should be reduced to 1 Billion people.

·       Wealth should be redistributed from the rich to the poor.

I am not making this up folks!!!!!!!

We have signed up for this and the bureaucrats and the politicians are making it happen.  Think about what has gone on in the last 15 years.

Bill Clinton did an end run on congress and designated many places in the US as National Monuments or Wilderness areas.

Europe, Japan, China, USA and most of the Western world have a big birth control program to limit population growth.

And we have Obummer and his redistribution of wealth programs..

This is not the illuminati, this is real!!! It is a plan generated by academics and third world politicians to remove our freedoms.

Before you think I have been drinking from the conspiracy bottle of tequila, I suggest that you google “Agenda 21” and watch some of the video and read some of the documentation.

Get the Republican candidates to repeal our signature to the “Agenda 21” treaty.


Monday, December 19, 2011

Catch 22-Our judicial System is broken


Catch 22

Our country’s legal system is broken.  We have way too many laws and way too many lawyers.  The nanny-state mentality is out of hand.  We all violate laws everyday and don’t know it until we get busted.

The Catch 22 part of the scenario is that laws are made by politicians, most politicians are lawyers.  It is a self serving system to provide jobs for lawyers.  The more laws we have the greater need for lawyers.  Politicians are lawyers so making laws becomes a jobs program.

The size of the government is directly proportional to the number of laws that are on the books.  Therefore not only do we provide a jobs program for lawyers, we also provide a jobs program for bureaucrats. 

What is the solution?  The only plausible solution is to pass a “Law limitation” amendment to the federal and every state constitution.  This simple amendment would say that ;”The maximum number of laws allowed is XXXXXXXXX.”  This would force the repeal of many antiquated and frivolous laws.  But the great thing about this amendment is that it would limit the size of government.

Find a politician that will support this amendment and you have found a winner!